This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Combined determination of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor,
activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), supports risk-adapted individualized therapy concepts,
particularly in node-negative breast cancer. The prognostic impact of both factors
in primary breast cancer was substantiated by a pooled analysis of > 8000 patients
with breast cancer and a multicenter prospective randomized therapy trial in nodenegative
breast cancer; findings achieved the highest level of evidence for tumor biomarkers.
Patients with node-negative breast cancer with low antigen levels of uPA and PAI-1
in their primary tumor tissue have a very good prognosis and therefore may be spared
the burden of adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with elevated uPA/PAI-1 antigen
levels carry an increased risk of disease recurrence. Recent retrospective analysis
of > 3000 patients indicated that patients with breast cancer with high uPA/PAI-1
values derive a significantly greater benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy than patients
with low uPA/PAI-1 levels. Similarly, in the multicenter prospective Chemo N0 trial,
administration of cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil— based chemotherapy
led to a substantial reduction in risk of disease recurrence in patients with high
uPA/PAI-1. However, benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy appears to be independent
of a patient's uPA/PAI-1 status. In metastatic breast cancer, retrospective studies
showed that elevated uPA or PAI-1 present in the primary tumor tissue are associated
with a poor response to later palliative endocrine therapy. These findings suggest
that high levels of uPA and/or PAI-1 do reflect an aggressive phenotype that may be
overcome or suppressed by early systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting but may be
too advanced for response to palliative therapy at a later stage.
Key words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical Breast CancerAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in cancer metastasis: a review.Int J Cancer. 1997; 72: 1-22
- Clinical impact of the plasminogen activation system in tumor invasion and metastasis: prognostic relevance and target for therapy.Thromb Haemost. 1997; 78: 285-296
- Clinical utility of uPA/PAI-1 determination in primary breast cancer tissue for individualized therapy concepts.Clin Breast Cancer. 2002; 3: 196-200
- External quality assessment of trans-European multicentre antigen determinations (ELISA) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type-1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in human breast cancer tissue extracts.Br J Cancer. 1998; 78: 1434-1441
- Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of uPA and PAI-1 in 8,377 breast cancer patients.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 116-128
- Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 3357-3365
- For the German Chemo N0 Study Group: randomized adjuvant therapy trial in high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type I.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 913-920
- For the German Chemo-N0 Study Group. Level-I evidence for prognostic and predictive impact of uPA and PAI-1 in node-negative breast cancer provided by second scheduled analysis of multicenter Chemo-N0 therapy trial.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001; 69: 213
- Clinical relevance of invasion factors uPA and PAI-1 for individualized therapy decisions in primary breast cancer is greatest when used in combination.J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 1000-1009
- Urokinase (uPA) and PAI-1 as selection criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients.in: Schmitt M Graeff H Jänicke F Prospects in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam1994: 207-218
- Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1: predictors of poor response to tamoxifen therapy in recurrent breast cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995; 87: 751-756
- Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is not related to response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Br J Cancer. 1997; 76: 537-540
- Enhanced benefit from adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer patients classified high-risk according to uPA and PAI-1 (n=3,424).Cancer Res. 2002; 62: 4617-4622
- Prognostic and predictive value of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2 in operable breast cancer.Int J Biol Markers. 2003; 18: 106-115
- Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 1456-1466
- Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.Nature. 2002; 415: 530-536
- A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1999-2009
- Multi-gene RT-PCR assay for predicting recurrence in node negative breast cancer patients: NSABP studies B-20 and B-14.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003; 82 (Abstract #16).: S10
- The plasminogen activation system as a novel target for therapeutic strategies.Fibrinolysis. 2000; 14: 114-132
- Interference with the urokinase plasminogen activator system: a promising therapy concept for solid tumors.Exp Opin Biol Ther. 2001; 1: 683-691
- Wilex Reports Positive Phase Ia Clinical Data on its Anti-Metastatic Urokinase Inhibitor WX-UK1.(Accessed January 10, 2004)
- Fox Chase Cancer Center and Wilex Awarded First Biotechnology Clinical Partnership Grant from Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program.(Accessed January 12, 2004)
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
May 10,
2004
Received in revised form:
May 10,
2004
Received:
January 14,
2004
Identification
Copyright
© 2004 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.