Advertisement
Original study| Volume 13, ISSUE 5, P364-370, October 2013

Download started.

Ok

Does the Result of Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Influence the Recommendation for Adjuvant Treatment in Sentinel Lymph Node–Positive Patients?

      Abstract

      Objective

      The Hungarian National Institute of Oncology has just closed a single-center randomized clinical study. The Optimal Treatment of the Axilla–Surgery or Radiotherapy (OTOASOR) trial compares completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive (SLN+) primary invasive breast cancer. In the investigational treatment arm, patients received 50 Gy RNI instead of cALND. In these patients we had information only about the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, but the further axillary nodal involvement remained unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the result of cALND influenced the recommendation for adjuvant treatment in patients with SLN+ breast cancer.

      Patients and Methods

      Patients with SLN+ primary breast cancer were randomized for cALND (arm A, standard treatment) or RNI (arm B, investigational treatment). Adjuvant systemic treatments were given according to the standard institutional protocol, and patients were followed according to the actual institutional guidelines.

      Results

      Between August 2002 and June 2009, 474 SLN+ patients were randomized to cALND (arm A, standard treatment = 244 patients) or RNI (arm B, investigational treatment = 230 patients). The 2 arms were well balanced according to the majority of main prognostic factors. However, more patients were premenopausal (34% vs. 27%; P = .095) and had pT2-3 tumors (57% vs. 40%; P = .003) in the completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) arm. On the other hand, there were more patients with known human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 positive tumor (12% vs. 17%, P = .066) in the RNI arm. In the ALND and RNI arms, 78% (190/244) and 69% (159/230), respectively, received chemotherapy (P = .020). Endocrine therapy was administered in 87% (213/244) of the patients in the ALND arm and 89% (204/230) of the patients in the RNI arm (P = .372). Six patients (2.5%) on arm A and 13 patients (5.7%) on arm B received adjuvant trastuzumab treatment (P = not significant). Subgroup analyses explored that more frequent administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in arm A was associated with the higher percentage of premenopausal patients and patients with larger (pT2-3) tumors.

      Conclusions

      The result of cALND after positive SLN biopsy seems to have no major impact on the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Breast Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Carter C.L.
        • Allen C.
        • Henson D.E.
        Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 124,740 breast cancer cases.
        Cancer. 1989; 63: 181-187
        • Veronesi U.
        • Paganelli G.
        • Viale G.
        • et al.
        Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 368-373
        • Veronesi U.
        • Paganelli G.
        • Viale G.
        • et al.
        A randomized comparison of sentinel node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 546-553
        • Giuliano A.E.
        • Haigh P.I.
        • Brennan M.B.
        • et al.
        Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18: 2553-2559
        • Guenther J.M.
        • Hansen N.M.
        • DiFronzo L.A.
        • et al.
        Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel nodes.
        Arch Surg. 2003; 138: 52-56
        • Chu K.U.
        • Turner R.R.
        • Hansen N.M.
        • et al.
        Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection?.
        Ann Surg. 1999; 229: 536-541
        • Fant J.S.
        • Grant M.D.
        • Knox S.M.
        • et al.
        Preliminary outcome analysis in patients with breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node who declined axillary dissection.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 126-130
        • Noguchi M.
        Avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection in selected patients with node-positive breast cancer.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008; 34: 129-134
        • Park J.
        • Fey J.V.
        • Naik A.M.
        • et al.
        A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 462-468
        • Hwang R.F.
        • Gonzalez-Angulo A.M.
        • Yi M.
        • et al.
        Low locoregional failure rates in selected breast cancer patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes who do not undergo completion axillary dissection.
        Cancer. 2007; 110: 723-730
        • Peintinger F.
        • Reitsamer R.
        • Stranzl H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of quality of life and arm complaints after axillary lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients.
        Br J Cancer. 2003; 89: 648-652
        • Fisher B.
        • Jeong J.H.
        • Anderson S.
        • et al.
        Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 567-575
        • Veronesi U.
        • Orecchia R.
        • Zurrida S.
        • et al.
        Avoiding axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy.
        Ann Oncol. 2005; 16: 383-388
        • Haffty B.G.
        • Hunt K.K.
        • Harris J.R.
        • Buchholz T.A.
        Positive sentinel nodes without axillary dissection: implications for the radiation oncologist.
        J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 4479-4481
        • Wernicke G.A.
        • Goodman R.L.
        • Turner B.C.
        • et al.
        A 10-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in patients with early stage breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes treated with tangential breast irradiation following sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 125: 893-902
        • Galper S.
        • Recht A.
        • Silver B.
        • et al.
        Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? Implications for treatment after positive sentinel node biopsy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 48: 125-132
        • Cserni G.
        • Gregori D.
        • Merletti F.
        • et al.
        Meta-analysis of nonsentinel node metastases associated with micrometastatic sentinel nodes in breast cancer.
        Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1245-1252
        • Yi M.
        • Giordano S.H.
        • Meric-Bernstam F.
        • et al.
        Trends in and outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs. SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer patients: experience from the SEER database.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: S343-S351
        • Langer I.
        • Guller U.
        • Viehl C.T.
        • et al.
        Axillary lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases may be safely omitted in early-stage breast cancer patients: long-term outcomes of a prospective study.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 3366-3374
        • Galimberti V.
        • Cole B.F.
        • Zurrida S.
        • et al.
        Update of the International Breast Cancer Study Group trial 23-01 to compare axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer and micrometastases in the sentinel node.
        Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 34
        • Giuliano A.E.
        • Hunt K.K.
        • Ballman K.V.
        • et al.
        Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. A randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2011; 305: 569-575
        • Morrow M.
        • Giuliano A.E.
        To cut is to cure: can we really apply Z0011 in practice?.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 2413-2415
        • Krag D.N.
        • Anderson S.J.
        • Julian T.B.
        • et al.
        Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 927-933
        • Straver M.E.
        • Meijnen P.
        • van T.G.
        • et al.
        Role of axillary clearance after a tumor-positive sentinel node in the administration of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 731-737