Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 21, ISSUE 3, P181-190.e2, June 2021

nextMONARCH: Abemaciclib Monotherapy or Combined With Tamoxifen for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Published:September 30, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2020.09.011

      Abstract

      Background

      Abemaciclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor administered continuously for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2) advanced breast cancer. Abemaciclib is associated with dose-dependent early-onset diarrhea. nextMONARCH evaluated abemaciclib monotherapy (with or without prophylactic loperamide) and combined with tamoxifen for endocrine refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after chemotherapy.

      Patients and Methods

      nextMONARCH is an open-label, controlled, randomized, phase II study of women with endocrine-refractory HR+, HER2 MBC previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients received abemaciclib 150 mg plus tamoxifen 20 mg (A+T), abemaciclib 150 mg every 12 hours (A-150), or abemaciclib 200 mg plus prophylactic loperamide (A-200). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS). PFS analyses tested superiority of A+T to A-200 and informal noninferiority of A-150 to A-200. The secondary objectives included the objective response rate (ORR), safety, and pharmacokinetics.

      Results

      The median PFS was 9.1 months for A+T versus 7.4 months for A-200 (hazard ratio, 0.815; 95% confidence interval, 0.556-1.193; P = .293). The A-200 PFS was comparable to that with A-150 at 6.5 months (hazard ratio, 1.045; 95% confidence interval, 0.711-1.535; P = .811). The ORR was 34.6%, 24.1%, and 32.5% for A+T, A-150, and A-200, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. The incidence and severity of diarrhea (62.3%; grade 3, 7.8%) with A-200 was similar to that with A-150 (67.1%; grade 3, 3.8%). The pharmacokinetics were comparable to previous observations.

      Conclusions

      The addition of tamoxifen to abemaciclib did not significantly improve PFS or ORR compared with abemaciclib monotherapy but confirmed the single-agent activity of abemaciclib in heavily pretreated HR+, HER2 MBC. Dose reductions and antidiarrheal medication generally managed diarrhea while maintaining efficacy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Breast Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brufsky A.M.
        Long-term management of patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: concepts for sequential and combination endocrine-based therapies.
        Cancer Treat Rev. 2017; 59: 22-32
        • Matutino A.
        • Joy A.A.
        • Brezden-Masley C.
        • et al.
        Hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: redrawing the lines.
        Curr Oncol. 2018; 25: S131-S141
        • Goetz M.P.
        • Toi M.
        • Campone M.
        • et al.
        MONARCH 3: abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 3638-3646
        • Sledge Jr., G.W.
        • Toi M.
        • Neven P.
        • et al.
        MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 2875-2884
        • Johnston S.
        • Martin M.
        • Di Leo A.
        • et al.
        MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer.
        NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019; 5: 5
        • Loibl S.
        • Turner N.C.
        • Ro J.
        • et al.
        Palbociclib combined with fulvestrant in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer and prior progression on endocrine therapy: PALOMA-3 results.
        Oncologist. 2017; 22: 1028-1038
        • Sledge Jr., G.W.
        • Toi M.
        • Neven P.
        • et al.
        The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy—MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Oncol. 2019; 6: 116-124
        • Slamon D.J.
        • Neven P.
        • Chia S.
        • et al.
        LBA7_PROverall survival (OS) results of the phase III MONALEESA-3 trial of postmenopausal patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with fulvestrant (FUL) ± ribociclib (RIB).
        Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: v851-v934
        • Im S.A.
        • Lu Y.S.
        • Bardia A.
        • et al.
        Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 307-316
        • Dickler M.N.
        • Tolaney S.M.
        • Rugo H.S.
        • et al.
        MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR(+)/HER2(−) metastatic breast cancer.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23: 5218-5224
        • Patnaik A.
        • Rosen L.S.
        • Tolaney S.M.
        • et al.
        Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, for patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and other solid tumors.
        Cancer Discov. 2016; 6: 740-753
        • O'Brien N.
        • Conklin D.
        • Beckmann R.
        • et al.
        Preclinical activity of abemaciclib alone or in combination with antimitotic and targeted therapies in breast cancer.
        Mol Cancer Ther. 2018; 17: 897-907
        • Tolaney S.M.
        • Beeram M.
        • Beck J.T.
        • et al.
        A phase Ib study of abemaciclib with therapies for metastatic breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33: 522
        • Hernandez R.K.
        • Sorensen H.T.
        • Pedersen L.
        • et al.
        Tamoxifen treatment and risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a Danish population-based cohort study.
        Cancer. 2009; 115: 4442-4449
        • Onitilo A.A.
        • Doi S.A.R.
        • Engel J.M.
        • et al.
        Clustering of venous thrombosis events at the start of tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer: a population-based experience.
        Thromb Res. 2012; 130: 27-31
        • Tate S.C.
        • Cai S.
        • Ajamie R.T.
        • et al.
        Semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the antitumor activity of LY2835219, a new cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, in mice bearing human tumor xenografts.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20: 3763-3774
        • Rydén L.
        • Heibert Arnlind M.
        • Vitols S.
        • et al.
        Aromatase inhibitors alone or sequentially combined with tamoxifen in postmenopausal early breast cancer compared with tamoxifen or placebo—meta-analyses on efficacy and adverse events based on randomized clinical trials.
        Breast. 2016; 26: 106-114
        • Cristofanilli M.
        • Turner N.C.
        • Bondarenko I.
        • et al.
        Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: 425-439