Advertisement

Risk Factors for the Development of Clinical and Subclinical Lymphedema Detected by Bioimpedance Spectroscopy

Published:April 21, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2022.04.003

      ABSTRACT

      Background

      Breast cancer-related lymphedema can significantly compromise quality of life. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measures extracellular fluid in lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of BIS-detected lymphedema using the L-Dex and identify risk factors associated with a positive score.

      Materials and Methods

      We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify patients who underwent L-Dex U400 measurements. Patients with a score of > 10 L-Dex units or with an increase of > 10 units from baseline had a positive score. Clinical lymphedema was determined by documentation in the chart at the time of positive measurement. Otherwise, patients were considered to have subclinical lymphedema.

      Results

      Fifty-three patients met study criteria. Thirty patients (56.6%) underwent mastectomy, 22 (41.5%) axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and 33 (62.3%) received radiation (RT). Twelve patients (22.6%) had a positive score. There were no differences in age, race, laterality, breast surgery, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, or RT fields (none, breast only, breast with LNs) in patients with a positive score. ALND was more common (66.7% vs. 34.2%, P= .04). BMI > 30 approached significance (58.3% vs. 29.3%, P= .06). Seven patients had subclinical lymphedema. No differences were identified comparing patients with subclinical lymphedema to those with negative scores. All 5 patients with clinical lymphedema underwent ALND and received nodal RT.

      Conclusion

      The combination of ALND and regional nodal RT is strongly associated with development of clinical lymphedema. It is difficult to identify patients at risk for subclinical BIS-detected lymphedema.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Breast Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Miller CL
        • Specht MC
        • Skolny MN
        • et al.
        Risk of lymphedema after mastectomy: potential benefit of applying ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 144: 71-77
        • Soran A
        • Ozmen T
        • McGuire KP
        • et al.
        The importance of detection of subclinical lymphedema for the prevention of breast cancer-related clinical lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection; a prospective observational study.
        Lymphat Res Biol. 2014; 12: 289-294
        • Laidley A
        • Anglin B.
        The Impact of L-Dex((R)) measurements in assessing breast cancer-related lymphedema as part of routine clinical practice.
        Front Oncol. 2016; 6: 192
        • Torres Lacomba M
        • Yuste Sanchez MJ
        • Zapico Goni A
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial.
        BMJ. 2010; 340: b5396
        • Stout Gergich NL
        • Pfalzer LA
        • McGarvey C
        • Springer B
        • Gerber LH
        • Soballe P.
        Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema.
        Cancer. 2008; 112: 2809-2819
        • Shah C
        • Arthur DW
        • Wazer D
        • Khan A
        • Ridner S
        • Vicini F.
        The impact of early detection and intervention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review.
        Cancer Med. 2016; 5: 1154-1162
        • Cornish BH
        • Thomas BJ
        • Ward LC
        • Hirst C
        • Bunce IH.
        A new technique for the quantification of peripheral edema with application in both unilateral and bilateral cases.
        Angiology. 2002; 53: 41-47
        • Cornish BH
        • Chapman M
        • Hirst C
        • et al.
        Early diagnosis of lymphedema using multiple frequency bioimpedance.
        Lymphology. 2001; 34: 2-11
        • Vicini F
        • Shah C
        • Lyden M
        • Whitworth P.
        Bioelectrical impedance for detecting and monitoring patients for the development of upper limb lymphedema in the clinic.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2012; 12: 133-137
        • Fu MR
        • Cleland CM
        • Guth AA
        • et al.
        L-dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
        Lymphology. 2013; 46: 85-96
        • Shah C
        • Vicini FA.
        Breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: incidence rates, diagnostic techniques, optimal management and risk reduction strategies.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81 (.): 907-914
        • Hayes S
        • Cornish B
        • Newman B.
        Comparison of methods to diagnose lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors: 6-month follow-up.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 89: 221-226
        • Ward LC
        • Dylke E
        • Czerniec S
        • Isenring E
        • Kilbreath SL.
        Confirmation of the reference impedance ratios used for assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy.
        Lymphat Res Biol. 2011; 9: 47-51
        • Shah C
        • Vicini F
        • Beitsch P
        • et al.
        The use of bioimpedance spectroscopy to monitor therapeutic intervention in patients treated for breast cancer related lymphedema.
        Lymphology. 2013; 46: 184-192
        • Box RC
        • Reul-Hirche HM
        • Bullock-Saxton JE
        • Furnival CM.
        Physiotherapy after breast cancer surgery: results of a randomised controlled study to minimise lymphoedema.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002; 75: 51-64
        • Kilbreath SL
        • Refshauge KM
        • Beith JM
        • Ward LC
        • Simpson JM
        • Hansen RD.
        Progressive resistance training and stretching following surgery for breast cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
        BMC Cancer. 2006; 6: 273
        • DiSipio T
        • Rye S
        • Newman B
        • Hayes S.
        Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 500-515
        • Park S
        • Lee JE
        • Yu J
        • et al.
        Risk factors affecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: serial body weight change during neoadjuvant anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxane.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2018; 18: e49-e54
        • Tsai RJ
        • Dennis LK
        • Lynch CF
        • Snetselaar LG
        • Zamba GK
        • Scott-Conner C.
        The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16: 1959-1972
        • Kaufman DI
        • Shah C
        • Vicini FA
        • Rizzi M.
        Utilization of bioimpedance spectroscopy in the prevention of chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 166: 809-815