Advertisement

The Accuracy of Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging For the Measurement of Invasive Breast Cancer With Extensive Intraductal Components

Published:October 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2022.10.004

      Abstract

      Background

      The precise preoperative evaluation of radiologic tumor size with extensive intraductal component (EIC) is important. This study compared the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure invasive breast cancer with EIC.

      Methods

      Between 2007 and 2012, we collected data from 6816 patients who underwent surgery for invasive breast cancer at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative surgical reports of the tumors, in which the invasive tumor size and EIC were measured separately. Finally, we included 370 women who underwent preoperative mammography, US, and MRI. Each modality was retrospectively reviewed to measure the size of invasive breast cancer with EIC. The reference standard was surgical pathologic size and the accuracies of the image were evaluated.

      Results

      Spearman's correlation coefficient for the size of invasive cancer with EIC was good between MRI (r = 0.741) and pathology, and moderate between mammography (r = 0.661) or US (r = 0.514) and pathology. Both mass and nonmass lesions showed good correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.672 and 0.612, respectively) in MRI. Furthermore, the subgroup of tumors without microcalcifications showed a higher correlation with MRI (ICC = 0.796) than with mammography (ICC = 0.620). However, the subgroup with microcalcifications showed a good correlation with mammography (ICC = 0.702) compared to MRI (ICC = 0.680) and US (ICC = 0.532).

      Conclusion

      The lesion on mammography, US, and MRI reflected preoperative size of invasive cancer with EIC. MRI shows a higher correlation than mammography and US. However, cancer with calcifications of mammography shows a more accurate size than MRI or US.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Breast Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Holland R
        • Connolly JL
        • Gelman R
        • et al.
        The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast.
        J clin Oncol. 1990; 8: 113-118
        • Schnitt SJ
        • Connolly JL
        • Harris JR
        • Hellman S
        • Cohen RB.
        Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in stage I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy.
        Cancer. 1984; 53: 1049-1057
        • Schnitt SJ
        • Harris JR.
        Evolution of breast-conserving therapy for localized breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1395-1396
        • Ikeda O
        • Nishimura R
        • Miyayama H
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance evaluation of the presence of an extensive intraductal component in breast cancer.
        Acta Radiologica. 2004; 45: 721-725
        • Kang DK
        • Jeon GS
        • Yim H
        • Jung YS.
        Diagnosis of the intraductal component of invasive breast cancer: assessment with mammography and sonography.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 1587-1600
        • Stomper PC
        • Connolly JL.
        Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158: 269-272
        • Boyages J
        • Recht A
        • Connolly JL
        • et al.
        Early breast cancer: predictors of breast recurrence for patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy.
        Radiother Oncol. 1990; 19: 29-41
        • Schnitt SJ
        • Abner A
        • Gelman R
        • et al.
        The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.
        Cancer. 1994; 74: 1746-1751
        • Berg WA
        • Gutierrez L
        • NessAiver MS
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
        Radiology. 2004; 233: 830-849
        • Ramirez SI
        • Scholle M
        • Buckmaster J
        • Paley RH
        • Kowdley GC.
        Breast cancer tumor size assessment with mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging at a community based multidisciplinary breast center.
        Am Surg. 2012; 78: 440-446
        • Ha SM
        • Cha JH
        • Shin HJ
        • Chae EY
        • Choi WJ
        • Kim HH
        Mammography, US, and MRI to assess outcomes of invasive breast cancer with extensive intraductal component: a matched cohort study.
        Radiology. 2019; 292: 299-308
        • Han HY
        • Kim KW
        • Park YS
        • et al.
        Imaging features for the prediction of extensive intraductal components in invasive cancer in addition to the histopathologic grades.
        J Korean Soc Radiol. 2009; 61 ([in Korean]): 413-423
        • Van Goethem M
        • Schelfout K
        • Kersschot E
        • et al.
        MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component.
        Eur J Radiol. 2007; 62: 273-282
        • CJ SE D’Orsi
        • EB D’Orsi
        • EA Morris
        ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
        American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. 2013;
        • Choi WJ
        • Cha JH
        • Kim HH
        • Shin HJ
        • Chae EY
        The accuracy of breast MR imaging for measuring the size of a breast cancer: analysis of the histopathologic factors.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2016; 16: e145-e152
        • Rovai AP
        • Baker JD
        • Ponton MK.
        Social Science Research Design and Statistics: A Practitioner's Guide to Research Methods and IBM SPSS.
        Watertree Press, Chesapeake, VA2013
        • Rosner B.
        Fundamentals of Biostatistics.
        6th ed. Thomson-Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA2006
        • Leong C
        • Boyages J
        • Jayasinghe UW
        • et al.
        Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.
        Cancer. 2004; 100: 1823-1832
        • Kim HR
        • Jung HK
        • Ko KH
        • Kim SJ
        • Lee KS.
        Mammography, US, and MRI for preoperative prediction of extensive intraductal component of invasive breast cancer: interobserver variability and performances.
        Clin Breast Cancer. 2016; 16: 305-311
        • Kim TH
        • Kang DK
        • Jung YS
        • Yim H.
        Usefulness of breast MRI for diagnosing an extensive intraductal component of breast cancer: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
        J Korean Radiol Soc. 2006; 54 ([in Korean]): 543-550
        • Kim Y
        • Jung HK
        • Park AY
        • Ko KH
        • Jang H.
        Diagnostic value of mammography for accompanying non-mass enhancement on preoperative breast MRI.
        Acta Radiol. 2021; 63: 1032-1042
        • Kang JH
        • Youk JH
        • Kim JA
        • et al.
        Identification of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features associated with positive resection margins in breast cancer: a retrospective study.
        Korean J Radiol. 2018; 19: 897-904
        • Sundararajan S
        • Tohno E
        • Kamma H
        • Ueno E
        • Minami M.
        Detection of intraductal component around invasive breast cancer using ultrasound: correlation with MRI and histopathological findings.
        Radiat Med. 2006; 24: 108-114
        • Chadashvili T
        • Ghosh E
        • Fein-Zachary V
        • et al.
        Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 204: 219-227
        • Mossa-Basha M
        • Fundaro GM
        • Shah BA
        • Ali S
        • Pantelic MV.
        Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation.
        RadioGraphics. 2010; 30: 1673-1687
        • Di Pasquale Guadalupe L
        • De Jesus J
        • Xiong Y
        • Rosa M.
        Tumor size and focality in breast carcinoma: analysis of concordance between radiological imaging modalities and pathological examination at a cancer center.
        Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020; 48151601
        • Wu Z-Y
        • Kim H-J
        • Lee J-W
        • et al.
        Breast cancer recurrence in the nipple-areola complex after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer.
        JAMA Surg. 2019; 154: 1030-1037