Advertisement
Original Study|Articles in Press

Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance for Patients With PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM Gene Mutations

Published:February 15, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2023.02.004

      Abstract

      Background

      This study aims to capture clinical and surgical practice patterns of patients with deleterious mutations in partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2), checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) and ataxia telangiesctasia mutated (ATM) genes.

      Materials and Methods

      This study is a retrospective chart review of patients with PALB2, CHEK2 or ATM mutations. Patient demographics, testing indications, management decisions, and surveillance strategies were recorded.

      Results

      Sixty-two patients were found to have deleterious mutations: 14 (23%) with a PALB2 mutation, 30 (48%) with a CHEK2 mutation, and 18 (29%) patients with an ATM mutation.
      Thirty-one (50%) patients have a history of breast cancer. Twenty-three patients were diagnosed and treated prior to genetic testing while 8 patients learned of their mutation status and breast cancer diagnosis simultaneously. Of these 8 patients, 4 sought treatment at our institution, 3 underwent bilateral mastectomy, and 1 patient opted for lumpectomy and surveillance.
      Thirty-one patients had no history of breast cancer. After genetic diagnosis, 3 of the 9 patients who continued clinical follow-up proceeded with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy within 2 years. Clinical surveillance continued for 23 months on average.

      Conclusion

      Most patients who learned of their genetic and breast cancer diagnoses simultaneously underwent bilateral mastectomy, whereas only a third of patients without cancer opted for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Breast Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sung H
        • Ferlay J
        • Siegel RL
        • et al.
        Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 countries.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 209-249
        • Vincent-Salomon A
        • Bataillon G
        • Djerroudi L.
        Hereditary breast carcinomas pathologist's perspective.
        Ann Pathol. 2020; 40: 78-84
        • Ollier M
        • Radosevic-Robin N
        • Kwiatkowski F
        • et al.
        DNA repair genes implicated in triple negative familial non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer predisposition.
        Am J Cancer Res. 2015; 5: 2113-2126
        • King MC
        • Marks JH
        • Mandell JB
        New York Breast Cancer Study G. Breast and ovarian Cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
        Science. 2003; 302: 643-646
        • Shiovitz S
        • Korde LA.
        Genetics of breast Cancer: a topic in evolution.
        Ann Oncol. 2015; 26: 1291-1299
        • Kuchenbaecker KB
        • Hopper JL
        • Barnes DR
        • et al.
        Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 2402-2416
        • Honold F
        • Camus M.
        Prophylactic mastectomy versus surveillance for the prevention of breast cancer in women's BRCA carriers.
        Medwave. 2018; 18: e7161
        • Tung N
        • Lin NU
        • Kidd J
        • et al.
        Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer susceptibility genes in a sequential series of patients with breast Cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 1460-1468
        • Hudson L
        • Gower N
        • Lenarcic S
        • Trufan SJ
        • White Jr., RL
        Radiographic surveillance of patients with Non-BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27: 2248-2254
        • Daly MB
        • Pal T
        • Berry MP
        • et al.
        Genetic/Familial High-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19: 77-102
        • Couch FJ
        • Shimelis H
        • Hu C
        • et al.
        Associations between Cancer predisposition testing panel genes and breast Cancer.
        JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 1190-1196
        • Hu C
        • Polley EC
        • Yadav S
        • et al.
        The contribution of germline predisposition gene mutations to clinical subtypes of invasive breast Cancer from a clinical genetic testing cohort.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020; 112: 1231-1241
        • Hauke J
        • Horvath J
        • Gross E
        • et al.
        Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1/2-negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting: results of the German Consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian Cancer.
        Cancer Med. 2018; 7: 1349-1358
        • Casadei S
        • Norquist BM
        • Walsh T
        • et al.
        Contribution of inherited mutations in the BRCA2-interacting protein PALB2 to familial breast cancer.
        Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 2222-2229
        • Cybulski C
        • Kluzniak W
        • Huzarski T
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation: a prospective cohort analysis.
        Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 638-644
        • Antoniou AC
        • Casadei S
        • Heikkinen T
        • et al.
        Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 497-506
        • Choi M
        • Kipps T
        • Kurzrock R.
        ATM mutations in Cancer: therapeutic implications.
        Mol Cancer Ther. 2016; 15: 1781-1791
        • Marabelli M
        • Cheng SC
        • Parmigiani G.
        Penetrance of ATM gene mutations in breast Cancer: a meta-analysis of different measures of risk.
        Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40: 425-431
        • Stucci LS
        • Interno V
        • Tucci M
        • et al.
        The ATM gene in breast Cancer: its relevance in clinical practice.
        Genes (Basel). 2021; : 12
        • Easton DF
        • Pharoah PD
        • Antoniou AC
        • et al.
        Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 2243-2257
        • Thompson D
        • Duedal S
        • Kirner J
        • et al.
        Cancer risks and mortality in heterozygous ATM mutation carriers.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97: 813-822
        • Broeks A
        • Urbanus JH
        • Floore AN
        • et al.
        ATM-heterozygous germline mutations contribute to breast Cancer-susceptibility.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 66: 494-500
        • van Os NJ
        • Roeleveld N
        • Weemaes CM
        • et al.
        Health risks for ataxia-telangiectasia mutated heterozygotes: a systematic review, meta-analysis and evidence-based guideline.
        Clin Genet. 2016; 90: 105-117
        • Naslund-Koch C
        • Nordestgaard BG
        • Bojesen SE.
        Increased risk for other Cancers in addition to Breast Cancer for CHEK2*1100delC Heterozygotes estimated from the Copenhagen general population study.
        J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 1208-1216
        • Huijts PE
        • Hollestelle A
        • Balliu B
        • et al.
        CHEK2*1100delC homozygosity in the Netherlands–prevalence and risk of breast and lung cancer.
        Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 22: 46-51
        • Cybulski C
        • Wokolorczyk D
        • Jakubowska A
        • et al.
        Risk of breast cancer in women with a CHEK2 mutation with and without a family history of breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 3747-3752
        • Liang M
        • Zhang Y
        • Sun C
        • et al.
        Association between CHEK2*1100delC and Breast Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Mol Diagn Ther. 2018; 22: 397-407
        • Han FF
        • Guo CL
        • Liu LH.
        The effect of CHEK2 variant I157T on cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis.
        DNA Cell Biol. 2013; 32: 329-335
        • Shaag A
        • Walsh T
        • Renbaum P
        • et al.
        Functional and genomic approaches reveal an ancient CHEK2 allele associated with breast cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.
        Hum Mol Genet. 2005; 14: 555-563
        • Broeks A
        • de Witte L
        • Nooijen A
        • et al.
        Excess risk for contralateral breast cancer in CHEK2*1100delC germline mutation carriers.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 83: 91-93